This file was created with JabRef 2.2b2.
Encoding: UTF8
@PREAMBLE{"\hyphenation{Vite-vitch
Cole-man
Rud-nicky
Pierre-hum-bert
Sonnen-stuhl
Eisen-beiss
Brad-low
Ble-vins
Bier-wisch
Booth-royd
Broadbent
Nitt-rouer
Zwitser-lood
Wunder-lich
Van-nest}"}
@STRING{JASA = {Journal of the Acoustical Society of America}}
@STRING{JML = {Journal of Memory and Language}}
@ARTICLE{Albright2002,
author = {Albright, A.},
title = {Islands of reliability for regular morphology: Evidence from Italian},
journal = {Language},
year = {2002},
volume = {78},
pages = {684--709},
number = {4},
month = dec,
abstract = {The representation of regular morphological processes has been the
subject of much controversy, particularly in the debate between single
and dual route models of morphology. I present a model of morphological
learning that posits rules and seeks to infer their productivity
by comparing their reliability in different phonological environments.
The result of this procedure is a grammar in which general rules
exist alongside more specific, but more reliable, generalizations
describing subregularities for the same process. I present results
from a nonce-probe (WUG) experiment in Italian, in which speakers
rated the acceptability of novel infinitives in various conjugation
classes. These results indicate that such subregularities are in
fact internalized by speakers, even for a regular morphological process.},
owner = {robfelty},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/Albright2002.pdf},
sn = {0097-8507},
timestamp = {2007.02.10},
ut = {ISI:000180204900006}
}
@ARTICLE{Albright2003,
author = {Albright, Adam and Hayes, Bruce},
title = {Rules vs. analogy in English past tenses: a computational/experimental
study},
journal = {Cognition},
year = {2003},
volume = {90},
pages = {119--161},
number = {2},
month = dec,
abstract = {Are morphological patterns learned in the form of rules? Some models
deny this, attributing all morphology to analogical mechanisms. The
dual mechanism model (Pinker, S., & Prince, A. (1998). On language
and connectionism: analysis of a parallel distributed processing
model of language acquisition. Cognition, 28, 73-193) posits that
speakers do internalize rules, but that these rules are few and cover
only regular processes; the remaining patterns are attributed to
analogy. This article advocates a third approach, which uses multiple
stochastic rules and no analogy. We propose a model that employs
inductive learning to discover multiple rules, and assigns them confidence
scores based on their performance in the lexicon. Our model is supported
over the two alternatives by new "wug test" data on English past
tenses, which show that participant ratings of novel pasts depend
on the phonological shape of the stem, both for irregulars and, surprisingly,
also for regulars. The latter observation cannot be explained under
the dual mechanism approach, which derives all regulars with a single
rule. To evaluate the alternative hypothesis that all morphology
is analogical, we implemented a purely analogical model, which evaluates
novel pasts based solely on their similarity to existing verbs. Tested
against experimental data, this analogical model also failed in key
respects: it could not locate patterns that require abstract structural
characterizations, and it favored implausible responses based on
single, highly similar exemplars. We conclude that speakers extend
morphological patterns based on abstract structural properties, of
a kind appropriately described with rules.},
keywords = {Rules, Analogy, Similarity, Past tenses, Dual mechanism model},
owner = {robfelty},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/AlbrightHayes2003.pdf},
timestamp = {2007.02.12}
}
@ARTICLE{Allen1994,
author = {Allen, Jont},
title = {How do humans process and recognize speech?},
journal = {IEEE Transactions of Speech and Audio Processing},
year = {1994},
volume = {2},
pages = {567-577},
number = {4},
keywords = {Allen, Jont}
}
@ARTICLE{Allen2002,
author = {Allen, Mark and Badecker, William},
title = {Inflectional Regularity: Probing the Nature of Lexical Representation
in a Cross-Modal Priming Task},
journal = {Journal of Memory and Language},
year = {2002},
volume = {46},
pages = {705--722},
number = {4},
month = may,
abstract = {Two cross-modal priming experiments address issues concerning the
representation and processing of regular and irregular morphology
in English as well as methodological issues concerning the use of
the cross-modal technique in lexical processing studies. Cross-modal
inflectional priming facilitates regular verbs (e.g., walked priming
walk) but not irregular verbs (e.g., gave priming give). We found
that similar but morphologically unrelated words (e.g., slam priming
slim) inhibit each other when presented cross-modally. Based on this
effect for form-based inhibition, we interpret the regular/irregular
verb priming asymmetry as a reflection of competition between orthographically
similar verb forms (e.g., gave-give) which results in target inhibition.
In support of this proposal, we found that orthographically dissimilar
irregular verbs (e.g., taught-teach) show strong priming facilitation.
We account for this result in terms of a two-level lexicon in which
irregular verb alternates have distinct form-level entries, but engage
a common entry at an abstract morphological level of representation.
In addition to serving as evidence concerning the representation
of English verbal inflection, the findings from these experiments
also set important limits on the claim that the cross-modal priming
paradigm automatically circumvents form-related processing effects
that are not morphological in character.},
keywords = {inflectional morphology, regularity, two-level model of lexical processing,
cross-modal priming, form-based inhibition.},
owner = {robfelty},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/AllenBadecker2002JML.pdf},
timestamp = {2006.12.13},
url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6WK4-45WGJ0Y-3/2/4e23b8078a19e6a7eb4f0a516cdb8583}
}
@MISC{Baayen1993,
author = {Baayen, H, R. and H. Rijn},
title = {The {CELEX} lexical database (CD-ROM)},
howpublished = {Philadelphia: Linguistics Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania},
year = {1993},
journal = {Philadelphia: Linguistics Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania},
keywords = {Baayen, H, R. and H. Rijn}
}
@ARTICLE{Baayen1997JML,
author = {Baayen, R. H. and Dijkstra, T. and Schreuder, R.},
title = {Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual-route
modes},
journal = {Journal Of Memory And Language},
year = {1997},
volume = {37},
pages = {94--117},
number = {1},
month = jul,
owner = {robfelty},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/BaayenDijkstraSchreuder1997.pdf},
sn = {0749-596X},
timestamp = {2007.02.09},
ut = {ISI:A1997XG92100005}
}
@ARTICLE{Baayen2006,
author = {Baayen, R. H. and Feldman, L. B. and Schreuder, R.},
title = {Morphological influences on the recognition of monosyllabic monomorphemic
words},
journal = {Journal Of Memory And Language},
year = {2006},
volume = {55},
pages = {290--313},
number = {2},
month = aug,
af = {Baayen, R. H.EOLEOLFeldman, L. B.EOLEOLSchreuder, R.},
owner = {robfelty},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/BaayenFeldmanSchreuder2006.pdf},
sn = {0749-596X},
timestamp = {2007.02.09},
ut = {ISI:000239352800009}
}
@ARTICLE{Baayen1997,
author = {Baayen, R. H. and Lieber, R. and Schreuder, R.},
title = {The morphological complexity of simplex nouns},
journal = {Linguistics},
year = {1997},
volume = {35},
pages = {861--877},
number = {5},
owner = {robfelty},
sn = {0024-3949},
timestamp = {2007.02.09},
ut = {ISI:A1997YE39500003}
}
@ARTICLE{Baayen2005,
author = {Baayen, R. H. and Martin, F. M. D.},
title = {Semantic density and past-tense formation in three germanic languages},
journal = {Language},
year = {2005},
volume = {81},
pages = {666--698},
number = {3},
month = sep,
owner = {robfelty},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/Baayen2005.pdf},
sn = {0097-8507},
timestamp = {2007.02.06},
ut = {ISI:000232076300006}
}
@ARTICLE{Bailey2001,
author = {Bailey, Todd M. and Hahn, Ulrike},
title = {Determinants of Wordlikeness: Phonotactics or Lexical Neighborhoods?},
journal = {Journal of Memory and Language},
year = {2001},
volume = {44},
pages = {568--591},
number = {4},
month = may,
abstract = {Wordlikeness, the extent to which a sound sequence is typical of words
in a language, affects language acquisition, language processing,
and verbal short-term memory. Wordlikeness has generally been equated
with phonotactic knowledge of the possible or probable sequences
of sounds within a language. Alternatively, wordlikeness might be
derived directly from the mental lexicon, depending only on similarity
to known words. This paper tests these two cognitively different
possibilities by comparing measures of phonotactic probability and
lexical influence, including a new model of lexical neighborhoods,
in their ability to explain empirical wordlikeness judgments. Our
data show independent contributions of both phonotactic probability
and the lexicon, with relatively greater influence from the lexicon.
The influence of a lexical neighbor is found to be an inverted-U-shaped
function of its token frequency. However, our results also indicate
that current measures are limited in their ability to account for
sequence typicality.},
keywords = {wordlikeness, phonotactics, token frequency, lexical neighborhood,
sequence typicality.},
owner = {robfelty},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/BaileyHahn2001.pdf},
timestamp = {2007.01.02},
url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6WK4-457VF34-14/2/9cd7bc170454fcfc79324ba8f7ad57a7}
}
@ARTICLE{Balota1984,
author = {Balota, David A. and James I. Chumbley},
title = {Are Lexical Decisions a Good Measure of Lexical Access? The Role
of Word Frequency in the Neglected Decision Stage},
journal = {Journal of Experimental Psychology},
year = {1984},
volume = {10},
pages = {340-357},
number = {3},
keywords = {Balota, David A. James I.},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/Classes/Linguistics/Ling812-Perception/Balota1984.pdf}
}
@ARTICLE{Balota2001,
author = {Balota, D. A. and Pilotti, M. and Cortese, M. J.},
title = {Subjective frequency estimates for 2,938 monosyllabic words},
journal = {Memory and Cognition},
year = {2001},
volume = {29},
pages = {639--647},
owner = {robfelty},
timestamp = {2007.02.09}
}
@ARTICLE{BenkiJASA,
author = {Benk\'i, Jos\'e},
title = {Quantitative evaluation of lexical status, word frequency and neighborhood
density as context effects in spoken word recognition},
journal = JASA,
year = {2003},
volume = {113},
pages = {1689-1705},
number = {3},
keywords = {Benkk, Jose}
}
@ARTICLE{BenkiPhonetica,
author = {Benk\'i, Jos\'e},
title = {Analysis of {E}nglish Nonsense Syllable Recognition in Noise},
journal = {Phonetica},
year = {2003},
volume = {60},
pages = {129-157},
keywords = {Benk��, Jos��},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/LSA2003/Phonetics in Phono/BenkiPhonetica.pdf}
}
@ARTICLE{Benki2005,
author = {Jos\'e Benk\'i and Robert Felty},
title = {Recognition of English phonemes in noise},
journal = JASA,
year = {2005},
volume = {117},
pages = {2568},
owner = {robfelty},
timestamp = {2006.10.09}
}
@UNPUBLISHED{BenkiMandarin,
author = {Benk\'i, Jos\'e and J. Myers and Terrance Nearey},
title = {Lexical Frequency Effects in {M}andarin},
year = {in preparation},
keywords = {Benki, Jose, J. and Terence Nearey, mandarin}
}
@ARTICLE{Berent2004,
author = {Berent, I. and Vaknin, V. and Shimron, J.},
title = {Does a theory of language need a grammar? Evidence from Hebrew root
structure},
journal = {Brain And Language},
year = {2004},
volume = {90},
pages = {170--182},
number = {1-3},
month = jul,
abstract = {Hebrew constrains the occurrence of identical consonants in its roots:
Identical consonants are acceptable root finally (e.g., skk), but
not root initially (e.g., kks). Speakers' ability to freely generalize
this constraint to novel phonemes (Berent, Marcus, Shimron, & Gafos,
2002) suggests that they represent segment identity-a relation among
mental variables. An alternative account attributes the restriction
on identical phonemes to their feature similarity, captured by either
the number of shared features or their statistical frequency-The
similarity account predicts that roots with partially similar consonants
(e.g., sgk) should be at least as acceptable as roots with fully
identical consonants (e.g., skk), and each of these roots should
be less acceptable than dissimilar controls (e.g., gdn). Contrary
to these predictions, three lexical decision experiments demonstrate
that full identity is more acceptable than partial similarity and
(in some cases) controls. Speakers' sensitivity to consonant identity
suggests that linguistic competence, in general, and phonology, in
particular, encompass a computational mechanism that operates over
variables. This conclusion is consistent with linguistic accounts
that postulate a symbolic grammatical component that is irreducible
to the statistical properties of the lexicon},
owner = {robfelty},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/BerentVaknin2003.pdf},
sn = {0093-934X},
timestamp = {2007.02.10},
ut = {ISI:000222062500018}
}
@ARTICLE{Bertram2000,
author = {Bertram, Raymond and Laine, Matti and Harald Baayen, R. and Schreuder,
Robert and Hyona, Jukka},
title = {Affixal Homonymy triggers full-form storage, even with inflected
words, even in a morphologically rich language},
journal = {Cognition},
year = {2000},
volume = {74},
pages = {B13--B25},
number = {2},
month = feb,
abstract = {This paper investigates whether affixal homonymy, the phenomenon that
one affix form serves two or more semantic/syntactic functions, affects
lexical processing of inflected words in a similar way for a morphologically
rich language such as Finnish as for morphologically restricted languages
such as Dutch and English. For the latter two languages, there is
evidence that affixal homonymy triggers full-form storage for inflected
words (Bertram, R., Schreuder, R., and Baayen, R. H. (in press).
The balance of storage and computation in morphological processing:
the role of word formation type, affixal homonymy, and productivity.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition;
. Processing of English inflectional morphology. Memory and Cognition,
25, 425-437). Two visual lexical decision experiments show the same
pattern for Finnish. Apparently, the substantially richer morphology
in Finnish does not prevent full-form storage for inflected words
when the affix is homonymic.},
keywords = {Affixal Homonymy, Full-form storage, Morphologically rich languages},
owner = {robfelty},
timestamp = {2007.02.09},
url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6T24-3Y6RF0B-4/2/04bb420f58933395ba981a099b02d02c}
}
@INCOLLECTION{Bierwisch1967,
author = {Bierwisch, Manfred},
title = {Syntactic features in morphology: General problems of so-called pronominal
inflection in {G}erman},
booktitle = {To Honor Roman Jakobson},
publisher = {Mouton},
year = {1967},
pages = {239-270},
address = {The Hague},
keywords = {Bierwisch, Manfred. 1967}
}
@INCOLLECTION{Blevins2000,
author = {Blevins, James P},
title = { Markedness and blocking in {G}erman declensional paradigms},
booktitle = { Lexicon in focus},
publisher = {Akademie-Verlag},
year = {2000},
editor = {Barbara Stiebels and Dieter Wunderlich},
pages = {83-103},
address = {Berlin},
keywords = {Blevins, James P}
}
@ARTICLE{Blevins1995,
author = {Blevins, James P},
title = { Syncretism and paradigmatic opposition},
journal = {Linguistics and Philosophy},
year = {1995},
volume = {18},
pages = {113-152},
keywords = {Blevins, James P}
}
@MISC{Praat,
author = {Boersma, Paul and Weenink, David},
title = {Praat: doing phonetics by computer (Version 4.4.12) [Computer program]},
year = {2006},
keywords = {Praat},
url = {http://www.praat.org/}
}
@ARTICLE{Boothroyd1988,
author = {Boothroyd, Arthur and Nittrouer, Susan},
title = {Mathematical treatment of context effects in phoneme and word recognition},
journal = JASA,
year = {1988},
volume = {84},
pages = {101-114},
keywords = {Boothroyd, A and Nittrouer S.},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/BoothroydNittrouer1988.pdf}
}
@INPROCEEDINGS{Boudelaa2000,
author = {Boudelaa, S. and Marslen-Wilson, W. D.},
title = {Non-concatenative morphemes in language processing: Evidence from
Modern Standard Arabic},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the Workshop on Spoken Word Access Processes},
year = {2000},
editor = {A. Cutler and J.M. McQueen and R. Zondervan},
pages = {23���-26},
address = {Nijmegen, The Netherlands},
publisher = {Max-Planck Institute for Psychol inguistics.},
owner = {robfelty},
timestamp = {2007.02.13}
}
@ARTICLE{Bradlow1999,
author = {Bradlow, Ann and David Pisoni},
title = {Recognition of spoken words by native and non-native listeners: Talker-,
listener- and item-related factors},
journal = JASA,
year = {1999},
volume = {106},
pages = {2074-2085},
number = {4},
keywords = {Bradlow, Ann and David Pisoni},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/BradlowPisoni1999.pdf}
}
@ARTICLE{Bradlow1994,
author = {Bradlow, Ann and David Pisoni},
title = {Using a multi-talker database to identify sentence- and talker-dependent
correlates of speech intelligibility: Preliminary results},
journal = JASA,
year = {1994},
volume = {95},
pages = {3010},
number = {5},
keywords = {Bradlow, Ann and David Pisoni}
}
@ARTICLE{Broadbent1967,
author = {Broadbent, D.},
title = {Word-Frequency Effect and Response Bias},
journal = {Psychological Review},
year = {1967},
volume = {74},
pages = {1-15},
keywords = {Broadbent, D.},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/Classes/Linguistics/Ling812-Perception/Broadbent1967.pdf}
}
@BOOK{Bybee2001,
title = {Phonology and Language Use},
publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
year = {2001},
author = {Joan Bybee},
owner = {robfelty},
timestamp = {2007.01.25}
}
@ARTICLE{Bybee1995,
author = {Bybee, Joan L.},
title = {Regular morphology and the lexicon},
journal = {Language and Cognitive Processes},
year = {1995},
volume = {10},
pages = {425-455},
keywords = {Bybee},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/Bybee1995.pdf}
}
@ARTICLE{Caramazza1988,
author = {Caramazza, Alfonso and Laudanna, Alessandro and Romani, Cristina},
title = {Lexical access and inflectional morphology},
journal = {Cognition},
year = {1988},
volume = {28},
pages = {297--332},
number = {3},
month = apr,
abstract = {This study investigated the hypothesis that lexical representations
are stored in morphologically decomposed form. Three lexical decision
experiments in which the morphological structure of nonword stimuli
was varied are reported. Systematic effects of morphological structure
on reaction time and error performance were obtained. In particular,
it was found that: (1) morphologically nondecomposable nonwords were
easiest to process; (2) nonwords with partial morphological structure
were processed with greater difficulty than this latter set of stimuli;
and, (3) morphologically legal nonwords (i.e., nonwords that are
exhaustively decomposable into morphemes) were processed with the
greatest difficulty. Furthermore, it was found that within the class
of morphologically legal nonwords performance was affected by the
type of relationship that obtained between the morphemes that comprised
a stimulus item. These results, which are interpreted as evidence
in favor of the hypothesis that lexical representations are morphologically
decomposed, are discussed in the context of the Augmented Addressed
Morphology Model.},
owner = {robfelty},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/CaramazzaLaudannaRomani1988.pdf},
timestamp = {2007.02.13},
url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6T24-45WHV6D-4D/2/2d9f0769a3f41e5937870a6958c1ebe6}
}
@INCOLLECTION{Chang2001,
author = {Steve Chang and Madelaine Plauch\'e and John Ohala},
title = {Markedness and consonant confusion asymmetries},
booktitle = {The role of speech perception in phonology},
publisher = {Academic Press},
year = {2001},
editor = {Elizabeth Hume and Keith Johnson },
address = {San Diego},
keywords = {ohala plauche chang confusion asymmetry}
}
@ARTICLE{Clahsen1999,
author = {Harald Clahsen},
title = {Lexical entries and rules of language:
A multidisciplinary study
of German inflection},
journal = {Behavioral and Brian Sciences},
year = {1999},
volume = {22},
pages = {991--1060},
abstract = {Following much work in linguistic theory, it is hypothesized that
the language faculty has a modular structure and consists of two
basic components, a lexicon of (structured) entries and a computational
system of combinatorial operations to form larger linguistic expressions
from lexical entries. This target article provides evidence for the
dual nature of the language faculty by describing recent results
of a multidisciplinary investigation of German inflection. We have
examined: (1) its linguistic representation, focussing on noun plurals
and verb inflection (participles), (2) processes involved in the
way adults produce and comprehend inflected words, (3) brain potentials
generated during the processing of inflected words, and (4) the way
children acquire and use inflection. It will be shown that the evidence
from all these sources converges and supports the distinction between
lexical entries and combinatorial operations. Our experimental results
indicate that adults have access to two distinct processing routes,
one accessing (irregularly) inflected entries from the mental lexicon
and another involving morphological decomposition of (regularly)
inflected words into stem�affix representations. These two processing
routes correspond to the dual structure of the linguistic system.
Results from event-related potentials confirm this linguistic distinction
at the level of brain structures. In children���s language, we have
also found these two processes to be clearly dissociated; regular
and irregular inflection are used under different circumstances,
and the constraints under which children apply them are identical
to those of the adult linguistic system.
Our findings will be explained in terms of a linguistic model that
maintains the distinction between the lexicon and the computational
system but replaces the traditional view of the lexicon as a simple
list of idiosyncrasies with the notion of internally structured lexical
representations.},
owner = {robfelty},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/Clahsen1999.pdf},
timestamp = {2007.02.13}
}
@ARTICLE{Clahsen2004,
author = {Clahsen, H. and Hadler, M. and Weyerts, H.},
title = {Speeded production of inflected words in children and adults},
journal = {Journal Of Child Language},
year = {2004},
volume = {31},
pages = {683--712},
number = {3},
month = aug,
abstract = {This study examines the production of regular and irregular participle
forms of German with high and low frequencies using a speeded production
task. 40 children in two age groups (five- to seven-year olds, eleven-
to twelve-year olds) and 35 adult native speakers of German listened
to stem forms of verbs presented in a sentential context and were
asked to produce corresponding participle forms as quickly and accurately
as possible. Dependent variables were the subjects' participle-production
latencies and error rates. We found contrasts between the production
of regular and irregular forms in both children and adults, with
respect to the production latencies and types of morphological error.
Children overapplied the regular patterns to forms that are irregular
in the adult language, but not vice versa. High-frequency irregular
participles were produced faster (and amongst the children more accurately)
than low-frequency ones, whereas regular participles yielded a reverse
frequency effect, i.e. longer production latencies for high-frequency
forms than for low-frequency ones, in the two groups of children
as well as in one subgroup of adults. We explain these findings from
the perspective of dual-mechanism models of inflection arguing that
the mental mechanisms and representations for processing morphologically
complex words ('words' and 'rules') are the same in children and
adults, and that the observed child/adult differences in participle
production are due to slower and less accurate lexical access in
children than in adults.},
owner = {robfelty},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/ClahsenHadlerWeyerts2004.pdf},
sn = {0305-0009},
timestamp = {2007.02.10},
ut = {ISI:000225903800008}
}
@ARTICLE{Clahsen2001,
author = {Clahsen, Harald and Sonja Isenbeiss and Meike Hadler and Ingrid Sonnenstuhl},
title = {The mental representations of inflected words: an experimental study
of adjectives and verbs in {G}erman},
journal = {Language},
year = {2001},
volume = {77},
pages = {510-543},
number = {3},
keywords = {Clahsen, Harald, Sonja Isenbeiss, Meike Hadler and Ingrid Sonnenstuhl},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/ClahsenEtAl2001.pdf}
}
@ARTICLE{ColeRudnicky1983,
author = {Ronald A. Cole and Alexander I. Rudnicky},
title = {What's new in speech perception? The research and ideas of {W}illiam
{C}handler {B}agley, 1874-1946},
journal = {Psychological Review},
year = {1983},
volume = {90},
pages = {94-101},
number = {1},
keywords = {Cole Rudnicky William Chandler Bagley}
}
@INPROCEEDINGS{Coleman1997,
author = {John Coleman and Janet Pierrehumbert},
title = {Stochastic phonological grammars and acceptability},
booktitle = {Computational phonology: Third meeting of the ACL special interest
group in computational phonology},
year = {1997},
editor = {John Coleman},
pages = {49-56},
address = {Somerset, NJ},
organization = {Association for Computational Linguistics},
publisher = {Association for Computational Linguistics},
owner = {robfelty},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/randomArticles/Coleman1997.pdf},
timestamp = {2006.10.24}
}
@ARTICLE{Coltheart1993,
author = {Coltheart, Max and Curtis, Brent and Atkins, Paul and Haller, Michael},
title = {Models of Reading Aloud: Dual-Route and Parallel-Distributed-Processing
Approaches,},
journal = {Psychological Review},
year = {1993},
volume = {100},
pages = {589--608},
number = {4},
month = oct,
abstract = {It has often been argued that various facts about skilled reading
aloud cannot be explained by any model unless that model possesses
a dual-route architecture (lexical and nonlexical routes from print
to speech). This broad claim has been challenged by Seidenberg and
McClelland (1989, 1990). Their model has but a single route from
print to speech, yet, they contend, it can account form major facts
about reading that have hitherto been claimed to require a dual-route
architecture. The authors identify 6 of these major facts about reading.
The 1-route model proposed by Seidenberg and McClelland can account
for the first of these but not the remaining 5. Because models with
dual-route architectures can explain all 6 of these basic facts about
reading, the authors suggest that this remains the viable architecture
for any tenable model of skilled reading and learning to read. The
dual-route cascaded model, a computational version of the dual-route
model, is described.},
owner = {robfelty},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/Coltheart1993.pdf},
timestamp = {2007.02.12},
url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6X04-46T966N-S/2/69edd4c17b69e04b5f29ecea4d05f1d6}
}
@ARTICLE{Connine1994,
author = {Connine, Cynthia M. and Dawn G. Glasko and Jian Wang},
title = {Vertical similarity in spoken word recognition: Multiple lexical
activation, individual differences, and the role of sentence context},
journal = {Perception and Psychophysics},
year = {1994},
volume = {56},
pages = {624-636},
number = {6},
keywords = {Connine bilingual }
}
@ARTICLE{Conrad2004,
author = {Conrad, M. and Jacobs, A.},
title = {Replicating syllable frequency effects in Spanish in German: One
more challenge to computational models of visual word recognition},
journal = {Language and Cognitive Processes},
year = {2004},
volume = {19},
pages = {369--390},
number = {3},
month = jun,
owner = {robfelty},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/Conrad2004.pdf},
timestamp = {2006.12.11}
}
@INCOLLECTION{Cutler1979,
author = {Cutler, Anne and Dennis Norris},
title = {Monitoring sentence comprehension},
booktitle = {Sentence processing: Psycholinguistics studies presented to Merrill
Garrett},
publisher = {Erlbaum},
year = {1979},
editor = {W. E. Cooper and E. C. T. Walker},
keywords = {Cutler, Anne, }
}
@ARTICLE{Cutler2004,
author = {Cutler, Anne and Andreas Weber and Roel Smits and Nicole Cooper},
title = {Patterns of {E}nglish phoneme confusions by native and non-native
listeners},
journal = JASA,
year = {2004},
volume = {116},
pages = {3668-3678},
number = {6},
keywords = {Cutler, Anne and Andreas Weber and Roel Smits and Nicole Cooper}
}
@PHDTHESIS{Dailey1997,
author = {Dailey-O'Cain, Jennifer L.},
title = {Geographic and Socio-political Influences on Language Ideology and
Attitudes Toward Language Variation in Post-unification Germany},
school = {University of Michigan},
year = {1997},
keywords = {Dailey O'Cain, language variation, German}
}
@BOOK{vanDam1940,
title = {Handbuch der {D}eutschen {S}prache. {Z}weiter {B}and: {W}ortlehre},
publisher = {J. B. Wolter's Uitgevers-Maatschappij N.V.},
year = {1940},
author = {van Dam, J.},
address = {Groningen},
owner = {robfelty},
timestamp = {2007.02.14}
}
@ARTICLE{Drews1995,
author = {Drews, Etta and Piene Zwitser\-lood},
title = {Morphological and Orthographic Similarity in Visual Word Recognition},
journal = {Journal of Experimental Psychology},
year = {1995},
volume = {21},
pages = {1098- 1116},
number = {5},
keywords = {Drews, Etta and Piene Zwitserlood}
}
@ARTICLE{Eddington2000,
author = {Eddington, D.},
title = {Analogy and the dual-route model of morphology},
journal = {Lingua},
year = {2000},
volume = {110},
pages = {281--298},
number = {4},
month = apr,
abstract = {Prasada and Pinker's (1993) subjects provided past tense forms of
nonce verbs. The subject's willingness to provide irregular past
tense forms correlated with the verb's phonological similarity to
existing irregular English verbs. However, there:was no correlation
between the number of nonce verbs assigned regular inflection, and
the verb's similarity to existing regular verbs. According to the
dual-route model, this is expected since irregular items are stored
in associative memory, while regular items take an allomorph of -ed
by rule. A single-route connectionist simulation failed to duplicate
the subject's behavior on regular verbs.
Two instance-based models were applied to the data: Analogical Modeling
of Language and the Tilburg Memory Based Learner. Each model employed
a-similarity algorithm to determine the behavior of all regular and
irregular items. Both models successfully mirrored the subject's
responses. Therefore, the data are consistent with an, instance-based
single-route model of morphology.},
owner = {robfelty},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/Eddington2000.pdf},
sn = {0024-3841},
timestamp = {2007.02.10},
ut = {ISI:000085868800003}
}
@ARTICLE{Elman2004,
author = {Elman, Jeffrey L.},
title = {An alternative view of the mental lexicon},
journal = {Trends in Cognitive Sciences},
year = {2004},
volume = {8},
pages = {301--306},
number = {7},
month = jul,
abstract = {An essential aspect of knowing language is knowing the words of that
language. This knowledge is usually thought to reside in the mental
lexicon, a kind of dictionary that contains information regarding
a word's meaning, pronunciation, syntactic characteristics, and so
on. In this article, a very different view is presented. In this
view, words are understood as stimuli that operate directly on mental
states. The phonological, syntactic and semantic properties of a
word are revealed by the effects it has on those states.},
owner = {robfelty},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/Elman2004.pdf},
timestamp = {2007.02.12}
}
@BOOK{Fletcher1953,
title = {Speech and Hearing in Communication},
publisher = {Krieger},
year = {1953},
author = {Fletcher, Harvey},
address = {New York},
keywords = {Fletcher, Harvey}
}
@ARTICLE{Forster2000,
author = {Forster, Kenneth I. and Azuma, Tamiko},
title = {Masked priming for prefixed words with bound stems: Does <i>submit</i>
prime <i>permit</i>?},
journal = {Language and Cognitive Processes},
year = {2000},
volume = {15},
pages = {539--561},
number = {4 - 5},
month = aug,
owner = {robfelty},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/Forster2000.pdf},
timestamp = {2006.12.13},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01690960050119698}
}
@ARTICLE{Plaut2000,
author = {Frost, Ram and Grainger, Jonathan},
title = {Cross-linguistic perspectives on morphological processing: An introduction},
journal = {Language and Cognitive Processes},
year = {2000},
volume = {15},
pages = {321--328},
number = {4 - 5},
month = aug,
owner = {robfelty},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/Frost2000.pdf},
timestamp = {2006.12.13},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01690960050119616}
}
@ARTICLE{Ganong1980,
author = {Ganong, William F. III},
title = {Phonetic Categorization in Auditory Word Perception},
journal = {Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance},
year = {1980},
volume = {6},
pages = {110-125},
number = {1},
keywords = {Ganong, Lexical Index Shift}
}
@ARTICLE{Goldinger1998,
author = {Gol\-dinger, Stephen D},
title = {Signal detection comparisons of phonemic and phonetic priming: The
flexible-bias problem},
journal = {Perception and Psychophysics},
year = {1998},
volume = {60},
pages = {952-965},
number = {6},
keywords = {Goldinger, Stephen D}
}
@PHDTHESIS{Gordon1997,
author = {Gordon, Matthew},
title = {Urban sound change beyond city limits: the spread of the Northern
Cities Shift in Michigan},
school = {University of Michigan dissertation},
year = {1997},
keywords = {Gordon northern cities shift}
}
@ARTICLE{Graf2005,
author = {Graf, R. and Nagler, M. and Jacobs, A. M.},
title = {Factor analysis of 57 variables in visual word recognition},
journal = {ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PSYCHOLOGIE},
year = {2005},
volume = {116},
pages = {205--218},
number = {4},
owner = {robfelty},
timestamp = {2006.12.11}
}
@ARTICLE{Hahn2000,
author = {Hahn, U. and Nakisa, R. C.},
title = {German inflection: Single route or dual route?},
journal = {Cognitive Psychology},
year = {2000},
volume = {41},
pages = {313--360},
number = {4},
month = dec,
keywords = {single dual route},
owner = {robfelty},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/HahnNakisa2000.pdf},
sn = {0010-0285},
timestamp = {2007.02.06},
ut = {ISI:000165767000001}
}
@ARTICLE{Hahne2006,
author = {Hahne, A. and Mueller, J. L. and Clahsen, H.},
title = {Morphological processing in a second language: Behavioral and event-related
brain potential evidence for storage and decomposition},
journal = {Journal Of Cognitive Neuroscience},
year = {2006},
volume = {18},
pages = {121--134},
number = {1},
month = jan,
owner = {robfelty},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/HahneMuellerClahsen2006.pdf},
sn = {0898-929X},
timestamp = {2007.02.10},
ut = {ISI:000235368200011}
}
@ARTICLE{Hillenbrand1995,
author = {Hillenbrand, J.M. and Getty, L.A. and Clark, M.J. and Wheeler, K.},
journal = JASA,
year = {1995},
volume = {97},
pages = {3099-3111},
number = {5},
keywords = {Hillendbrand english vowels Peterson and Barney}
}
@ARTICLE{Hirsh1954,
author = {Hirsh, I., Elizabeth g. and Maurice Joseph},
title = {Intelligibility of Different Speech Materials},
journal = JASA,
year = {1954},
volume = {26},
pages = {530-538},
number = {4},
keywords = {Hirsh, I., Elizabeth g. and Maurice Joseph}
}
@ARTICLE{Imai2005,
author = {Satomi Imai and Amanda C. Walley and James E. Flege},
title = {Lexical frequency and neighborhood density effects on the recognition
of native and Spanish-accented words by native English and Spanish
listeners},
journal = JASA,
year = {2005},
volume = {117},
pages = {896--907},
abstract = {This study examined the effect of presumed mismatches between speech
input and the phonological representations of English words by native
speakers of English �NE� and Spanish �NS�. The English test words,
which were produced by a NE speaker and a NS speaker, varied orthogonally
in lexical frequency and neighborhood density and were presented
to NE listeners and to NS listeners who differed in English pronunciation
proficiency. It was hypothesized that mismatches between phonological
representations and speech input would impair word recognition, especially
for items from dense lexical neighborhoods which are phonologically
similar to many other words and require finer sound discrimination.
Further, it was assumed that L2 phonological representations would
change with L2 proficiency. The results showed the expected mismatch
effect only for words from dense neighborhoods. For Spanish-accented
stimuli, the NS groups recognized more words from dense neighborhoods
than the NE group did. For native-produced stimuli, the low-proficiency
NS group recognized fewer words than the other two groups. The-high
proficiency NS participants��� performance was as good as the NE group���s
for words from sparse neighborhoods, but not for words from dense
neighborhoods. These results are discussed in relation to the development
of phonological representations of L2 words.},
owner = {robfelty},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/ImaiWalleyFlege2005.pdf},
timestamp = {2007.02.15}
}
@BOOK{IPA,
title = {Handbook of the International Phonetic Association},
publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
year = {1999},
author = {{International Phonetic Association}},
owner = {robfelty},
timestamp = {2007.02.08}
}
@ARTICLE{Isel2003,
author = {Isel, Fr\'ederic and Thomas C. Gunter and Angela D. Friederici},
title = {Prosody-Assisted Head-Driven Access to Spoken {G}erman Compounds},
journal = {Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition},
year = {2003},
volume = {29},
pages = {277-288},
number = {2},
keywords = {Isel, Frederic, Thomas C. and Angela D.}
}
@ARTICLE{Jacobs1991,
author = {Jacobs, Robert A. and Jordan, Michael I. and Barto, Andrew G.},
title = {Task decomposition through competition in a modular connectionist
architecture: The what and where vision tasks},
journal = {Cognitive Science},
year = {1991},
volume = {15},
pages = {219--250},
number = {2},
abstract = {A novel modular connectionist architecture is presented in which the
networks composing the architecture compete to learn the training
patterns. An outcome of the competition is that different networks
learn different training patterns and, thus, learn to compute different
functions. The architecture performs task decomposition in the sense
that it learns to partition a task into two or more functionally
independent tasks and allocates distinct networks to learn each task.
In addition, the architecture tends to allocate to each task the
network whose topology is most appropriate to that task. The architecture's
performance on "what" and "where" vision tasks is presented and compared
with the performance of two multilayer networks. Finally, it is noted
that function decomposition is an underconstrained problem, and,
thus, different modular architectures may decompose a function in
different ways. A desirable decomposition can be achieved if the
architecture is suitably restricted in the types of functions that
it can compute. Finding appropriate restrictions is possible through
the application of domain knowledge. A strength of the modular architecture
is that its structure is well suited for incorporating domain knowledge.},
owner = {robfelty},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/JacobsJordanBarto1991.pdf},
timestamp = {2007.02.14}
}
@INCOLLECTION{Johnson1997,
author = {Keith Johnson},
title = {Speech perception without speaker normalization: An exemplar model},
booktitle = {Talker Variability in Speech Processing},
publisher = {Academic Press},
year = {1997},
editor = {Keith Johnson and J.W. Mullennix},
address = {San Diego},
keywords = {Johnson, exemplar}
}
@ARTICLE{deJong2000,
author = {Nivja H. de Jong and Robert Schreuder and R. Harald Baayen},
title = {The morphological family size effect and morphology},
journal = {Language and Cognitive Processes},
year = {2000},
volume = {V15},
pages = {329--365},
number = {4},
month = aug,
owner = {robfelty},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/deJongSchreuderBaayen2000.pdf},
timestamp = {2007.02.09},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01690960050119625}
}
@ARTICLE{Krott2006,
author = {Krott, A. and Baayen, R. H. and Hagoort, P.},
title = {The nature of anterior negativities caused by misapplications of
morphological rules},
journal = {Journal Of Cognitive Neuroscience},
year = {2006},
volume = {18},
pages = {1616--1630},
number = {10},
month = oct,
af = {Krott, AndreaEOLEOLBaayen, R. HaraldEOLEOLHagoort, Peter},
owner = {robfelty},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/KrottBaayenHagoort2006.pdf},
sn = {0898-929X},
timestamp = {2007.02.06},
ut = {ISI:000241278500002}
}
@BOOK{Kucera1967,
title = {Computational Analysis of Present Day American {E}nglish},
publisher = {Brown University Press},
year = {1967},
author = {Ku{\v c}era, F. and Francis, W.},
address = {Providence},
keywords = {Kucera, F., and Francis, W. }
}
@INCOLLECTION{Lahiri2002,
author = {Aditi Lahiri and Henning Reetz},
title = {Underspecified Recognition},
booktitle = {Papers in Laboratory Phonology 7},
publisher = {Mouton de Gruyter},
year = {2002},
editor = {Carlos Gussenhoven, Natasha Warner and Toni Rietveld},
address = {New York},
keywords = {Lahiri Reetz FUL}
}
@ARTICLE{Laine1999,
author = {Laine, M and S. Vainio and J. Hy\"on\"a},
title = {Lexical access routes to nouns in a morphologically rich language},
journal = {Journal of Memory and Language},
year = {1999},
volume = {40},
pages = {109-135},
keywords = {Laine, M, S. and J. Hyona}
}
@MISC{Lenzo1998,
author = {Lenzo, K.},
title = {Text-to-phoneme converter builder software},
year = {1998},
owner = {robfelty},
timestamp = {2007.02.19},
url = {http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~lenzo/t2p/}
}
@ARTICLE{Lorch1990,
author = {Lorch, Robert F. and Myers, Jerome L.},
title = {Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research.},
journal = {Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition},
year = {1990},
volume = {16},
pages = {149--157},
number = {1},
month = jan,
abstract = {Repeated measures designs involving nonorthogonal variables are being
used with increasing frequency in cognitive psychology. Researchers
usually analyze the data from such designs inappropriately, probably
because the designs are not discussed in standard textbooks on regression.
Two commonly used approaches to analyzing repeated measures designs
are considered in this article. It is argued that both approaches
use inappropriate error terms for testing the effects of independent
variables. A more appropriate analysis is presented, and two alternative
computational procedures for the analysis are illustrated. (PsycINFO
Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved)},
comment = {Accession Number: xlm-16-1-149. First Author & Affiliation: Lorch,
Robert F.; U Kentucky, Lexington, US. Release Date: 19900401. Publication
Type: Journal, Peer Reviewed Journal. Language: English. Major Descriptor(s):
Cognitive Psychology; Experimentation; Repeated Measures; Statistical
Regression. Minor Descriptor(s): Methodology. Classification: Cognitive
Processes (2340); Population: Human (10); . References Available:
Y.},
issn = {0278-7393},
keywords = {regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive psychology
research, Cognitive Psychology, Experimentation, Repeated Measures,
Statistical Regression, Methodology},
owner = {robfelty},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/LorchMyers1990.pdf},
publisher = {American Psychological Assn},
timestamp = {2007.01.02},
url = {http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pdh&AN=xlm-16-1-149&site=ehost-live}
}
@PHDTHESIS{Luce1986,
author = {Paul Luce},
title = {Neighborhoods of words in the mental lexicon},
school = {Indiana University},
year = {1986},
owner = {robfelty},
timestamp = {2006.10.09}
}
@ARTICLE{Luce1998,
author = {Luce, Paul and David Pisoni},
title = {Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model},
journal = {Ear and Hearing},
year = {1998},
volume = {19},
pages = {1-36},
keywords = { NAM Luce Pisoni},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/Classes/Linguistics/Ling812-Perception/LucePisoni1998.pdf}
}
@ARTICLE{Munte1999,
author = {M\"unte, Thomas F and Tessa Say and Harald Clahsen and Kolja Schiltz
and Marta Kutas},
title = {Decomposition of morphologically complex words in {E}nglish: evidence
from event-related brain potentials},
journal = {Cognitive Brain Research},
year = {1999},
volume = {7},
pages = {241 - 253},
keywords = {Munte, Thomas F and Tessa Say, Harald Clahsen, Kolja Schiltz and Marta
Kutas},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/MunteEtAl1999.pdf}
}
@ARTICLE{MacWhinney1991,
author = {MacWhinney, Brian and Leinbach, Jared},
title = {Implementations are not conceptualizations: Revising the verb learning
model},
journal = {Cognition},
year = {1991},
volume = {40},
pages = {121--157},
number = {1-2},
month = aug,
abstract = {In a recent issue of this journal, Pinker and Prince (1988) and Lachter
and Bever (1988) presented detailed critiques of Rumelhart and McClelland's
(1986) connectionist model of the child's learning of the phonological
form of the English past tense. In order to address these criticisms,
a new connectionist model was constructed using the back-propagation
algorithm, a larger input corpus, a fuller paradigm, and a new phonological
representation. This new implementation successfully addressed the
criticisms of the phonological representation used by Rumelhart and
McClelland. It did a much better job of learning the past tense using
a fuller input set with realistic frequencies of occurrence. Ancillary
simulations using the same network were able to deal with the homonymy
problem and the generation of forms like "ated" from "ate". The one
feature not provided by the new model was a way of modeling early
correct production of irregular forms. The success of the new model
can be used to help clarify the extent to which the published critiques
apply to a particular connectionist implementation as opposed to
fundamental principles underlying the broader connectionist conceptualization.},
owner = {robfelty},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/MacWhinneyLeinbach1991.pdf},
timestamp = {2007.02.13}
}
@ARTICLE{Marcus1995,
author = {Marcus, G. F. and Brinkman, U. and Clahsen, H. and Wiese, R. and
Pinker, S.},
title = {German inflection: The exception that proves the rule},
journal = {Cognitive Psychology},
year = {1995},
volume = {29},
pages = {189--256},
number = {3},
month = dec,
abstract = {Language is often explained as the product of generative rules and
a memorized lexicon. For example, most English verbs take a regular
past tense suffix (ask-asked), which is applied to new verbs (faxed,
wugged), suggesting the mental rule ''add-ed to a Verb.'' Irregular
verbs (break-broke, go-went) would be listed in memory. Alternatively,
a pattern associator memory (such as a connectionist network) might
record all past tense forms and generalize to new ones by similarity;
irregular and regular patterns would differ only because of their
different numbers of verbs. We present evidence that mental rules
are indispensible. A rule concatenates a suffix to a symbol for verbs,
so it does not require access to memorized verbs or their sound patterns,
but applies as the ''default,'' whenever memory access fails. We
find 21 such circumstances for regular past tense formation, including
novel, unusual-sounding, and rootless and headless derived words;
in every case, people inflect them regularly (explaining quirks like
flied out, sabre-tooths, walkmans). Contrary to the connectionist
account, these effects are not due to regular words constituting
a large majority of vocabulary. The German participle -t applies
to a much smaller percentage of verbs than its English counterpart,
and the German plural -s applies to a small minority of nouns. Bur
the affixes behave in the language like their English counterparts,
as defaults. We corroborate this effect in two experiments eliciting
ratings of participle and plural forms of novel German words. Thus
default suffixation is not due to numerous regular words reinforcing
a pattern in associative memory. Because default cases do not occupy
a cohesive similarity space, but do correspond to the range of a
symbol, they are evidence for a memory-independent, symbol-concatenating
mental operation},
owner = {robfelty},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/MarcusBrinkmannClahsenWiesePinker1995.pdf},
sn = {0010-0285},
timestamp = {2007.02.11},
ut = {ISI:A1995TM28500001}
}
@INPROCEEDINGS{Marian1999,
author = {Marian, V. and Spivey, M.},
title = {Activation of {R}ussian and {E}nglish cohorts during bilingual spoken
word recognition },
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science
Society},
year = {1999},
pages = {349-354},
address = {Mahwah, NJ},
publisher = {Erlbaum},
keywords = {marian spivey}
}
@ARTICLE{Marslen-Wilson2001,
author = {Marslen-Wilson, William},
title = {Access to lexical representations: Cross-linguistic issues},
journal = {Language and Cognitive Processes},
year = {2001},
volume = {16},
pages = {699-708},
number = {5/6},
keywords = {Marslen-Wilson, William},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/Marslen-Wilson2001.pdf}
}
@ARTICLE{Marslen-Wilson1994,
author = {Marslen-Wilson, William and Lorraine K. Tyler and Rachelle Waksler
and Lianne Older},
title = {Morphology and meaning in the {E}nglish mental lexicon},
journal = {Psychological Review},
year = {1994},
volume = {101},
pages = {3-33},
keywords = {Marslen-Wilson}
}
@ARTICLE{Marslen-Wilson1989,
author = {Marslen-Wilson, William and Pienie Zwitser\-lood},
title = {Accessing Spoken Words: The Importance of Word Onsets},
journal = {Journal of Experimental Psychology},
year = {1989},
volume = {15},
pages = {576-585},
number = {3},
keywords = {Marslen-Wilson, William and Pienie Zwitserlood}
}
@ARTICLE{Martin2004,
author = {Martin, Fermin Moscoso del Prado and Kostic, Aleksandar and Baayen,
R. Harald},
title = {Putting the bits together: an information theoretical perspective
on morphological processing},
journal = {Cognition},
year = {2004},
volume = {94},
pages = {1--18},
number = {1},
month = nov,
abstract = {In this study we introduce an information-theoretical formulation
of the emergence of type- and token-based effects in morphological
processing. We describe a probabilistic measure of the informational
complexity of a word, its information residual, which encompasses
the combined influences of the amount of information contained by
the target word and the amount of information carried by its nested
morphological paradigms. By means of re-analyses of previously published
data on Dutch words we show that the information residual outperforms
the combination of traditional token- and type-based counts in predicting
response latencies in visual lexical decision, and at the same time
provides a parsimonious account of inflectional, derivational, and
compounding processes.},
keywords = {Inflection, Derivation, Compound, Morphology, Information theory,
Lexical decision},
owner = {robfelty},
timestamp = {2007.02.09},
url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6T24-4C4X2C5-1/2/d88949c7cd3de31445656da63c1d1cbb}
}
@ARTICLE{McClelland1988,
author = {McClelland, James L.},
title = {Connectionist models and psychological evidence},
journal = {Journal of Memory and Language},
year = {1988},
volume = {27},
pages = {107--123},
number = {2},
month = apr,
abstract = {In this article I review the connectionist framework for modeling
psychological processes, and I examine the role of connectionist
models in empirical psychology. I illustrate how modeling can reveal
the empirical implications of general principles, and I point out
that the connectionist framework is particularly apt for formalizing
certain proposed processing principles. The framework has led to
the discovery of new classes of explanations for basic findings;
it has led to unified accounts of disparate or contradictory phenomena;
and it has shed light on the relevance of certain types of evidence
for basic questions about the nature of the processing system.},
owner = {robfelty},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/McClelland1988.pdf},
timestamp = {2007.02.14},
url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6WK4-4D62K31-5M/2/c289e7eb53f8187ca46ec4d12f403260}
}
@ARTICLE{McClellandElman,
author = {McClelland, J. L. and J. L. Elman},
title = {The TRACE model of spoken word recognition},
journal = {Cognitive Psychology},
year = {1986},
volume = {18},
pages = {1-86},
keywords = {McClelland, J. and J.}
}
@ARTICLE{McClelland2002,
author = {McClelland, James L. and Patterson, Karalyn},
title = {Rules or connections in past-tense inflections: what does the evidence
rule out?},
journal = {Trends in Cognitive Sciences},
year = {2002},
volume = {6},
pages = {465--472},
number = {11},
month = nov,
abstract = {Pinker and colleagues propose two mechanisms - a rule system and a
lexical memory - to form past tenses and other inflections. They
predict that children's acquisition of the regular inflection is
sudden; that the regular inflection applies uniformly regardless
of phonological, semantic or other factors; and that the rule system
is separably vulnerable to disruption. A connectionist account makes
the opposite predictions. Pinker has taken existing evidence as support
for his theory, but the review of the evidence presented here contradicts
this assessment. Instead, it supports all three connectionist predictions:
gradual acquisition of the past tense inflection; graded sensitivity
to phonological and semantic content; and a single, integrated mechanism
for regular and irregular forms, dependent jointly on phonology and
semantics.},
keywords = {Rules, Connectionist Models, Parallel-Distributed Processing, Langauge
Processing, Past Tense, Inflectional Morphology},
owner = {robfelty},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/McClelland2002.pdf},
timestamp = {2007.02.11},
url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6VH9-4777Y0F-D/2/698e13cee7eec7f957060cc0ef95d656}
}
@ARTICLE{Meador2000,
author = {Diane Meador and James E. Flege and Ian R. A. Mackay},
title = {Factors affecting the recognition of words in a second language},
journal = {Bilingualism: Language and Cognition},
year = {2000},
volume = {3},
pages = {55-67},
abstract = {This study examined the recognition of English words by groups of
native speakers of Italian who differed in age of arrival in Canada
and amount of continued native language use. The dependent variable
was the number of words correctly repeated in English sentences presented
in noise. Significantly higher word recognition scores were obtained
for early than late bilinguals, and for early bilinguals who used
Italian seldom than for early bilinguals who used Italian relatively
often. A hierarchical regression analysis showed that the native
Italian participants' ability to perceive English vowels and consonants
accounted for a significant amount of variance in the word-recognition
scores independently of age of arrival, amount of L1 use, and length
of residence in Canada. The native language use effect was interpreted
to have arisen from differences in the extent to which the early
bilinguals' Italian phonetic system influenced the representations
they developed for English vowels and consonants},
owner = {robfelty},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/MeadorFlegeMackay2000.pdf},
timestamp = {2007.02.15}
}
@ARTICLE{Moon1994,
author = {Seung-Jae Moon and Bjorn Lindblom},
title = {Interaction between duration, context, and speaking style in English
stressed vowels},
journal = {The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America},
year = {1994},
volume = {96},
pages = {40-55},
number = {1},
keywords = {VOWELS; SPEECH; TIMING PROPERTIES},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/MoonLindblom1997.pdf},
publisher = {ASA}
}
@ARTICLE{Murphy2004,
author = {Murphy, V. A.},
title = {Dissociable systems in second language inflectional morphology},
journal = {Studies In Second Language Acquisition},
year = {2004},
volume = {26},
pages = {433--459},
number = {3},
month = sep,
abstract = {Pinker and Prince (1988) argued that two dissociable systems underlie
the development of linguistic representations: one rule governed
and the other associative. These two dissociable systems of representation
and processing are claimed to be a linguistic universal (Pinker,
1999). Therefore, one should expect that nonnative speakers of a
language also manifest the same kinds of dissociations in performance
between rule-based and associative features of language as native
speakers. The study reported here extends the work of Prasada and
Pinker (1993) into the second language (L2) domain to test whether
nonnative speakers (a) perform similarly to native speakers and (b)
dissociate rule-based from associative features of language. In Prasada
and Pinker, the degree of similarity between a nonce verb and a real
English verb influenced past-tense generalizations on nonce irregular
verbs but did not influence generalizations on nonce regular verbs.
In the experiment reported here, first language (L1) and L2 participants
of different ages and language groups were compared or the same task
as that used by Prasada and Pinker. Participants overall produced
more verbs with a past-tense suffix for nonce regular items than
for the nonce irregular items. Significant group effects indicate
that participants' varying levels of experience with English play
an important role in their past-tense productions of nonce verbs.
Furthermore, similarity influenced both the regular and irregular
verbs on a production task. These results are discussed in terms
of whether there are two dissociable systems underlying L2 linguistic
knowledge and whether an alternative single associative learning
mechanism could be responsible for the development of the system
of regular and irregular inflectional morphology in both L1 and L2
learning.},
owner = {robfelty},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/Murphy2004.pdf},
sn = {0272-2631},
timestamp = {2007.02.10},
ut = {ISI:000224743300003}
}
@INCOLLECTION{Nakisa2001,
author = {Nakisa, R. C. and Plunkett, K. and Hahn, U.},
title = { A cross-linguistic comparison of single and dual-route models of
inflectional morphology},
booktitle = {Models of language acquisition: inductive and deductive approaches},
publisher = {MIT Press},
year = {2001},
editor = {P. Broeder and J. Murre},
address = {Cambridge, MA},
owner = {robfelty},
timestamp = {2007.02.13}
}
@INCOLLECTION{Nearey2004,
author = {Nearey, Terrance},
title = {On the Factorability of Phonological Units in Speech Perception},
booktitle = {Laboratory Phonology 6},
publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
year = {2004},
editor = {John Local and Richard Ogden and Rosalind Temple},
address = {Cambridge},
keywords = {Nearey, Terrance}
}
@UNPUBLISHED{NeareySimulate,
author = {Nearey, Terrance},
title = {The factorability of phonological units in speech perception: Simulating
results on speech reception in noise},
note = {In R. Smyth (ed.) A festschrift for Bruce Derwing},
year = {in press},
keywords = {Nearey, Terrance}
}
@ARTICLE{Newman1997,
author = {Newman, Rochelle S. and James R. Sawusch and Paul A. Luce},
title = {Lexical Neighborhood Effects in Phonetic Processing},
journal = {Journal of Experimental Psychology},
year = {1997},
volume = {23},
pages = {873- 889},
number = {1},
keywords = {Newman, Rochelle S, James R. and Paul A.},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/Classes/Linguistics/Ling812-Perception/Newman1997.pdf}
}
@ARTICLE{Nittrouer1990,
author = {Nittrouer, S. and Boothroyd, A.},
title = {Context effects in phoneme and word recognition by young children
and older adults},
journal = JASA,
year = {1990},
volume = {87},
pages = {2705-2715},
keywords = {boothroyd, nittrouer, age}
}
@ARTICLE{Norris2000,
author = {Norris, Dennis and James M. McQueen and Anne Cutler},
title = {Merging information in speech: Feedback is never necessary},
journal = {Behavioral and Brain Sciences},
year = {2000},
volume = {23},
pages = {299-370},
keywords = {Norris, Dennis, James M. McQueen and Anne Cutler}
}
@TECHREPORT{Nusbaum1984,
author = {Nusbaum, H. C. and Pisoni, D. B. and Davis, C. K. },
title = {Sizing up the Hoosier mental lexicon: Measuring the familiarity of
20 000 words},
institution = {Speech Research Laboratory, Psychology Department, Indiana University,
Bloomington},
year = {1984},
type = {Research on Speech Perception Progress Report No. 10 },
number = {10},
keywords = {hoosier mental lexicon}
}
@ARTICLE{Nygaard1998,
author = {Nygaard, L. C. and Pisoni, D. B.},
title = {Talker-specific learning in speech perception},
journal = {Perception and Psychophysics},
year = {1998},
volume = {60},
pages = {335--376},
owner = {robfelty},
timestamp = {2007.02.15}
}
@ARTICLE{Nygaard1994,
author = {Nygaard, L. C. and Sommers, M. C. and Pisoni, David. B.},
title = {Speech perception as a talker-contingent process},
journal = {Psychological Science},
year = {1994},
volume = {5},
pages = {42--46},
owner = {robfelty},
timestamp = {2007.02.15}
}
@ARTICLE{Olsen1997,
author = {Olsen, Wayne and Dianne Van Tasell and Charles Speaks},
title = {Phoneme and word recognition for words in isolation and sentences},
journal = {Ear and Hearing},
year = {1997},
volume = {18},
pages = {175-188},
number = {3},
keywords = {Olsen, Wayne, Dianne Van Tasell and Charles Speaks},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/OlsenEtAl1997.pdf}
}
@ARTICLE{Pallier2001,
author = {Pallier,Christophe and Colome,Angels and Sebastian-Galles,Nuria},
title = {The Influence of Native-language Phonology on Lexical Access: Exemplar-Based
Versus Abstract Lexical Entries},
journal = {Psychological Science},
year = {2001},
volume = {12},
pages = {445-449},
number = {6},
abstract = {This study used medium-term auditory repetition priming to investigate
word-recognition processes. Highly fluent Catalan-Spanish bilinguals
whose first language was either Catalan or Spanish were tested in
a lexical decision task involving Catalan words and nonwords. Spanish-dominant
individuals, but not Catalan-dominant individuals, exhibited repetition
priming for minimal pairs differing in only one feature that is nondistinctive
in Spanish (e.g., /net@/ vs. /nEt@/), thereby indicating that they
processed these words as homophones. This finding provides direct
evidence both that word recognition uses a language-specific phonological
representation and that lexical entries are stored in the mental
lexicon as abstract forms.},
doi = {10.1111/1467-9280.00383},
eprint = {http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1467-9280.00383},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/PallierColomeSebastian-Galles2001.pdf}
}
@ARTICLE{Penke2002,
author = {Penke, M. and Krause, M.},
title = {German noun plurals: A challenge to the Dual-Mechanism Model},
journal = {Brain And Language},
year = {2002},
volume = {81},
pages = {303--311},
number = {1-3},
month = apr,
abstract = {In this article, the authors test one of the central claims of the
Dual-Mechanism Model (Pinker & Prince, 1994), that is, that regular
inflection equals default inflection. Based on results from an elicitation
task with eight agrammatic Broca's aphasics and a lexical decision
task with unimpaired subjects, the authors show that this assumption
is not borne out. Their data on German plural inflection rather indicate
that regular inflection is not necessarily identical to default inflection.
To capture the German data. they have to assume regular but input-restricted
inflection besides regular default inflection.},
owner = {robfelty},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/PenkeKrause2002.pdf},
sn = {0093-934X},
timestamp = {2007.02.11},
ut = {ISI:000175771500026}
}
@ARTICLE{Perea1998,
author = {Perea, Manuel and Carreiras, Manuel},
title = {Effects of syllable frequency and syllable neighborhood frequency
in visual word recognition.},
journal = {Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance},
year = {1998},
volume = {24},
pages = {134--144},
number = {1},
month = feb,
abstract = {Three experiments were carried out to analyze the role of syllable
frequency in lexical decision and naming. The results show inhibitory
effects of syllable frequency in the lexical decision task for both
high- and low-frequency words. In contrast, the effect of syllable
frequency is facilitatory in the naming task. A post hoc analysis
revealed the important role played by the number of higher frequency
syllabic neighbors (words that share a syllable with the target)
in the lexical decision task and the role of the frequency of the
first syllable in the naming task. Experiment 3 manipulated the neighborhood
syllable frequency directly by comparing words with few higher frequency
syllabic neighbors and words with many higher frequency syllabic
neighbors in the lexical decision task; an inhibitory neighborhood
syllable frequency effect was found. The results are interpreted
in terms of current models of visual word recognition and word naming.
(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved) (from
the journal abstract)},
comment = {Accession Number: xhp-24-1-134. First Author & Affiliation: Perea,
Manuel; U de Val����ncia, Facultat de Psicologia, Area de Metodologia,
Val����ncia, Spain. Release Date: 19980401. Publication Type: Journal,
Peer Reviewed Journal. Language: English. Major Descriptor(s): Lexical
Decision; Orthography; Syllables; Word Frequency; Word Recognition.
Minor Descriptor(s): Naming; Words (Phonetic Units). Classification:
Cognitive Processes (2340); Population: Human (10); Location: Spain.
Age Group: Adulthood (18 yrs & older) (300); Young Adulthood (18-29
yrs) (320); . Methodology: Empirical Study. References Available:
Y.},
issn = {0096-1523},
keywords = {syllable frequency & number & frequency of orthographic neighbors
of high- vs low-frequency words, lexical decision & word naming,
college students, Spain, Lexical Decision, Orthography, Syllables,
Word Frequency, Word Recognition, Naming, Words (Phonetic Units)},
owner = {robfelty},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/pereaCarreiras1998.pdf},
publisher = {American Psychological Assn},
timestamp = {2007.01.09}
}
@ARTICLE{PetersonBarney,
author = {G. E. Peter\-son and H. L. Barney},
title = {Control methods used in a study of the vowels},
journal = JASA,
year = {1952},
volume = {24},
pages = {175-184},
keywords = {Peterson and Barney}
}
@ARTICLE{Pinker1988,
author = {Pinker, Steven and Prince, Alan},
title = {On language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed
processing model of language acquisition},
journal = {Cognition},
year = {1988},
volume = {28},
pages = {73--193},
number = {1-2},
month = mar,
abstract = {Does knowledge of language consist of mentally-represented rules?
Rumelhart and McClelland have described a connectionist (parallel
distributed processing) model of the acquisition of the past tense
in English which successfully maps many stems onto their past tense
forms, both regular (walk/walked) and irregular (go/went), and which
mimics some of the errors and sequences of development of children.
Yet the model contains no explicit rules, only a set of neuronstyle
units which stand for trigrams of phonetic features of the stem,
a set of units which stand for trigrams of phonetic features of the
past form, and an array of connections between the two sets of units
whose strengths are modified during learning. Rumelhart and McClelland
conclude that linguistic rules may be merely convenient approximate
fictions and that the real causal processes in language use and acquisition
must be characterized as the transfer of activation levels among
units and the modification of the weights of their connections. We
analyze both the linguistic and the developmental assumptions of
the model in detail and discover that (1) it cannot represent certain
words, (2) it cannot learn many rules, (3) it can learn rules found
in no human language, (4) it cannot explain morphological and phonological
regularities, (5) it cannot explain the differences between irregular
and regular forms, (6) it fails at its assigned task of mastering
the past tense of English, (7) it gives an incorrect explanation
for two developmental phenomena: stages of overregularization of
irregular forms such as bringed, and the appearance of doubly-marked
forms such as ated and (8) it gives accounts of two others (infrequent
overregularization of verbs ending in t/d, and the order of acquisition
of different irregular subclasses) that are indistinguishable from
those of rule-based theories. In addition, we show how many failures
of the model can be attributed to its connectionist architecture.
We conclude that connectionists' claims about the dispensability
of rules in explanations in the psychology of language must be rejected,
and that, on the contrary, the linguistic and developmental facts
provide good evidence for such rules.},
owner = {robfelty},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/PinkerPrince1988.pdf},
timestamp = {2007.02.11}
}
@ARTICLE{Pinker2002reply,
author = {Pinker, S. and Ullman, M.},
title = {Combination and structure, not gradedness, is the issue - Reply to
McClelland and Patterson},
journal = {Trends In Cognitive Sciences},
year = {2002},
volume = {6},
pages = {472--474},
number = {11},
month = nov,
abstract = {We defend the theory that irregular past-tense forms are stored in
the lexicon, a division of declarative memory, whereas regular inflection
is rule-driven and based in grammatical processing. This dual-mechanism
approach differs from single-system connectionist approaches, which
fail to capture all the data.},
owner = {robfelty},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/PinkerUllman2002reply.pdf},
sn = {1364-6613},
timestamp = {2007.02.11},
ut = {ISI:000179170000011}
}
@ARTICLE{Pinker2002,
author = {Pinker, S. and Ullman, M. T.},
title = {The past and future of the past tense},
journal = {Trends In Cognitive Sciences},
year = {2002},
volume = {6},
pages = {456--463},
number = {11},
month = nov,
abstract = {What is the interaction between storage and computation in language
processing? What is the psychological status of grammatical rules?
What are the relative strengths of connectionist and symbolic models
of cognition? How are the components of language implemented in the
brain? The English past tense has served as an arena for debates
on these issues. We defend the theory that irregular past-tense forms
are stored in the lexicon, a division of declarative memory, whereas
regular forms can be computed by a concatenation rule, which requires
the procedural system. Irregulars have the psychological, linguistic
and neuropsychological signatures of lexical memory, whereas regulars
often have the signatures of grammatical processing. Furthermore,
because regular inflection is rule-driven, speakers can apply it
whenever memory fails.},
owner = {robfelty},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/PinkerUllman2002.pdf},
sn = {1364-6613},
timestamp = {2007.02.11},
ut = {ISI:000179170000008}
}
@ARTICLE{Plaut2000a,
author = {Plaut, David C. and Gonnerman, Laura M.},
title = {Are non-semantic morphological effects incompatible with a distributed
connectionist approach to lexical processing?},
journal = {Language and Cognitive Processes},
year = {2000},
volume = {15},
pages = {445--485},
number = {4 - 5},
month = aug,
owner = {robfelty},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/Plaut2000.pdf},
timestamp = {2006.12.13},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01690960050119661}
}
@ARTICLE{Plunkett1991,
author = {Plunkett, Kim and Marchman, Virginia},
title = {U-shaped learning and frequency effects in a multi-layered perception:
Implications for child language acquisition},
journal = {Cognition},
year = {1991},
volume = {38},
pages = {43--102},
number = {1},
month = jan,
abstract = {A three-layer back-propagation network is used to implement a pattern
association task in which four types of mapping are learned. These
mappings, which are considered analogous to those which characterize
the relationship between the stem and past tense forms of English
verbs, include arbitrary mappings, identity mappings, vowel changes,
and additions of a suffix. The degree of correspondence between parallel
distributed processing (PDP) models which learn mappings of this
sort (e.g., Rumelhart & McClelland, 1986, 1987) and children's acquisition
of inflectional morphology has recently been at issue in discussions
of the applicability of PDP models to the study of human cognition
and language (Pinker & Mehler, 1989; Bever, in press). In this paper,
we explore the capacity of a network to learn these types of mappings,
focusing on three major issues. First, we compare the performance
of a single-layered perceptron similar to the one used by Rumerlhart
and McClelland with a multi-layered perceptron. The results suggest
that it is unlikely that a single-layered perceptron is capable of
finding an adequate solution to the problem of mapping stems and
past tense forms in input configurations that are sufficiently analogous
to English. Second, we explore the input conditions which determine
learning in these networks. Several factors that characterize linguistic
input are investigated: (a) the nature of the mapping performed by
the network (arbitrary, suffixation, identity, and vowel change);
(b) the competition effects that arise when the task demands simultaneous
learning of distinct mapping types; (c) the role of the type and
token frequency of verb stems; and (d) the influence of phonological
subregularities in the irregular verbs. Each of these factors is
shown to have selective consequences on both successful and erroneous
performance in the network. Third, we outline several types of systems
which could result in U-shaped acquisition, and discuss the ways
in which learning in multi-layered networks can be seen to capture
several characteristics of U-shaped learning in children. In general,
these models provide information about the role of input in determining
the kinds of errors that a network will produce, including the conditions
under which rule-like behavior and U-shaped learning will and will
not emerge. The results from all simulations are discussed in light
of behavioral data on children's acquisition of the past tense and
the validity of drawing conclusions about the acquisition of language
from models of this sort.},
owner = {robfelty},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/PlunkettMarchman1991.pdf},
timestamp = {2007.02.14}
}
@ARTICLE{Pothos2005,
author = {Pothos, E. M.},
title = {The rules versus similarity distinction},
journal = {Behavioral And Brain Sciences},
year = {2005},
volume = {28},
pages = {1--+},
number = {1},
month = feb,
abstract = {The distinction between rules and similarity is central to our understanding
of much of cognitive psychology. Two aspects of existing research
have motivated the present work. First, in different cognitive psychology
areas we typically see different conceptions of rules and similarity;
for example, rules in language appear to be of a different kind compared
to rules in categorization. Second, rules processes are typically
modeled as separate from similarity ones; for example, in a learning
experiment, rules and similarity influences would be described on
the basis of separate models. in the present article, I assume that
the rules versus similarity distinction can be understood in the
same way in learning, reasoning, categorization, and language, and
that a unified model for rules and similarity is appropriate. A rules
process is considered to be a similarity one where only a single
or a small subset of an object's properties are involved. Hence,
rules and overall similarity operations are extremes in a single
continuum of similarity operations. It is argued that this viewpoint
allows adequate coverage of theory and empirical findings in learning,
reasoning, categorization, and language, and also a reassessment
of the objectives in research on rules versus similarity.},
owner = {robfelty},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/Pothos2005.pdf},
sn = {0140-525X},
timestamp = {2007.02.06},
ut = {ISI:000229944100001}
}
@ARTICLE{Prasada1993,
author = {Prasada, S. and Pinker, S},
title = {Generalization of regular and irregular morphological patterns},
journal = {Language and Cognitive Processes},
year = {1993},
volume = {8},
pages = {1--56},
owner = {robfelty},
timestamp = {2007.02.13}
}
@ARTICLE{Prince1988,
author = {Prince, Alan and Pinker, Steven},
title = {Rules and connections in human language},
journal = {Trends in Neurosciences},
year = {1988},
volume = {11},
pages = {195--202},
number = {5},
abstract = {Recently `connectionist' or `parallel distributed processing' (PDP)
approaches to brain modelling have attracted an enormous amount of
attention. These models are said to be faithful to neurophysiological
and to behavioral data in a way that previous approaches based on
symbolic computation were not. A PDP simulation by Rumelhart and
McClelland of children's acquisition of the past tense in English
has been one of the most famous demonstrations of the advantages
of the connectionist approach. In a recent special issue of the journal
Cognition devoted to Connectionism and Symbol Systems, Steven Pinker
and Alan Prince examine this model and the relevant data in great
detail, finding severe limitations in the ability of current PDP
models to explain human language and cognition. The key points of
their analysis are summarised in the following article.},
owner = {robfelty},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/PrasadaPinker1993.pdf},
timestamp = {2007.02.11},
url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6T0V-482YFJR-2J/2/2f7474e120061a838a5d449ec45fcb28}
}
@ARTICLE{Prince1988wickel,
author = {Prince, Alan and Pinker, Steven},
title = {Wickelphone ambiguity},
journal = {Cognition},
year = {1988},
volume = {30},
pages = {189--190},
number = {2},
month = nov,
owner = {robfelty},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/PrincePinker1988wickelphone.pdf},
timestamp = {2007.02.11},
url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6T24-45Y1213-16/2/8ee5c0c5f3f54e7d2c3bdc49c4660d91}
}
@ARTICLE{Ramscar2002,
author = {Ramscar, M.},
title = {The role of meaning in inflection: Why the past tense does not require
a rule},
journal = {Cognitive Psychology},
year = {2002},
volume = {45},
pages = {45--94},
number = {1},
month = aug,
abstract = {How do we produce the past tenses of verbs? For the last 20 years
this question has been the focal domain for conflicting theories
of language, knowledge representation, and cognitive processing.
On one side of the debate have been similarity-based or single-route
approaches that propose that all past tenses are formed simply through
phonological analogies to existing past tenses stored in memory.
On the other side of the debate are rule-based or dual-route approaches
which agree that phonological analogy is important for producing
irregular past tenses (e.g., think 7 thought), but argue that regular
past tenses (e.g., walk --> walked) are generated via a +ed rule
and that a principled account of regular inflection can only be given
by recourse to explicit rules. This debate has become a crucial battleground
for arguments concerning the necessity and importance of abstract
mental rules, embracing not only language processing, but also the
of nature cognition itself. However, in centering on the roles of
phonological similarity and rules, the past tense debate has largely
ignored the possible role of semantics in determining inflection.
This paper presents five studies that demonstrate a striking and
decisive role of semantic similarity in inflection. In fact, semantic
factors appear to be more important in inflection than the grammatical
considerations put forward by the dual-route account. Further, these
new findings provide a new way of discriminating between the claims
of single-route (similarity-based) and dual-route (rule-based) approaches.
It appears that inflection is carried out through analogical reminding
based on semantic and phonological similarity and that a rule-based
route is not necessary to account for past tense inflection.},
owner = {robfelty},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/Ramscar2002.pdf},
sn = {0010-0285},
timestamp = {2007.02.10},
ut = {ISI:000177350700002}
}
@ARTICLE{Redford1999,
author = {Redford, Melissa A and Randy L.},
title = {The relative perceptual distinctiveness of initial and final consonants
in CVC syllables},
journal = JASA,
year = {1999},
volume = {106},
pages = {1555-1565},
number = {3},
keywords = {Redford, Melissa A and Randy L.}
}
@PHDTHESIS{Reid2001,
author = {Reid, A.},
title = {The combinatorial lexicon: Psycholinguistic studies of Polish morphology.},
school = {Birkbeck College, University of London.},
year = {2001},
owner = {robfelty},
timestamp = {2007.02.13}
}
@INCOLLECTION{Rumelhart1986,
author = {David E. Rumelhart and James L. McClelland},
title = {On learning the past tenses of English verbs},
booktitle = {Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure
of Cognition},
publisher = {MIT Press},
year = {1986},
editor = {James L. McLelland and David E. Rumelhart},
volume = {2},
chapter = {18},
pages = {216--271},
owner = {robfelty},
timestamp = {2007.02.12}
}
@ARTICLE{Samuel1981,
author = {Samuel, Arthur G},
title = {Phonemic Restoration: Insights From a New Methodology},
journal = {Journal of Experimental Psychology},
year = {1981},
volume = {110},
pages = {474-494},
number = {4},
keywords = {Samuel, Arthur G}
}
@ARTICLE{Schreuder1997,
author = {Schreuder, R. and Baayen, R. H.},
title = {How complex simplex words can be},
journal = {Journal Of Memory And Language},
year = {1997},
volume = {37},
pages = {118--139},
number = {1},
month = jul,
owner = {robfelty},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/SchreuderBaayen1997.pdf},
sn = {0749-596X},
timestamp = {2007.02.09},
ut = {ISI:A1997XG92100006}
}
@ARTICLE{Schreuder1994,
author = {Schreuder, R. and Baayen, R. Harald.},
title = {Prefix Stripping Re-Revisited},
journal = {Journal Of Memory And Language},
year = {1994},
volume = {33},
pages = {357--375},
number = {1},
owner = {robfelty},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/SchreuderBaayen1994.pdf},
timestamp = {2007.02.09}
}
@ARTICLE{Schroeder1968,
author = {Schroeder, M.},
title = {Reference signal for signal quality studies},
journal = JASA,
year = {1968},
volume = {44},
pages = {1735--1736},
keywords = {Schroeder, M.}
}
@ARTICLE{Seidenberg1989,
author = {Seidenberg, Mark S. and McClelland, James L.},
title = {A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming.},
journal = {Psychological Review},
year = {1989},
volume = {96},
pages = {523--568},
number = {4},
month = oct,
abstract = {The model described consists of sets of orthographic and phonological
units and an interlevel of hidden units. Weights on connections between
units were modified during a training phase using the back-propagation
learning algorithm. The model simulates many aspects of human performance,
including (a) differences between words in terms of processing difficulty,
(b) pronunciation of novel items, (c) differences between readers
in terms of word recognition skill, (d) transitions from beginning
to skilled reading, and (e) differences in performance on lexical
decisions and naming tasks. The model's behavior early in the learning
phase corresponds to that of children acquiring word recognition
skills. Training with a smaller number of hidden units produces output
characteristic of many dyslexic readers. Naming is simulated without
pronunciation rules, and lexical decisions are simulated without
assessing word-level representations. The performance of the model
is largely determined by three factors: the nature of the input,
a significant fragment of written English; the learning rule, which
encodes the implicit structure of the orthography in the weights
on connections; and the architecture of the system, which influences
the scope of what can be learned. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006
APA, all rights reserved)},
comment = {Accession Number: rev-96-4-523. First Author & Affiliation: Seidenberg,
Mark S.; McGill U, Montreal, PQ, Canada. Release Date: 19900201.
Publication Type: Journal, Peer Reviewed Journal. Language: English.
Major Descriptor(s): Language Development; Models; Naming; Word Recognition.
Minor Descriptor(s): Reading. Classification: Cognitive Processes
(2340); Population: Human (10); . References Available: Y.},
issn = {0033-295X},
keywords = {model of word recognition & naming, language development & reading,
Language Development, Models, Naming, Word Recognition, Reading},
owner = {robfelty},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/SeidenbergMcClelland1989.pdf},
publisher = {American Psychological Assn},
timestamp = {2007.02.14}
}
@ARTICLE{Sereno1997,
author = {Sereno, J. and Jongman, A.},
title = {Processing of {E}nglish inflectional morphology},
journal = {Memory and Cognition},
year = {1997},
volume = {25},
pages = {425-437},
keywords = {Sereno, J. and Jongman A.}
}
@ARTICLE{Shannon1999,
author = {Shannon, R.V. and Jensvold, A. and Padilla, M. and Robert, M.E. and
Wang, X.},
title = {Consonant recordings for speech testing},
journal = JASA,
year = {1999},
volume = {106},
pages = {L71-L74},
number = {6},
keywords = {Shannon}
}
@ARTICLE{Stemberger2004,
author = {Stemberger, J. P.},
title = {Phonological priming and irregular past},
journal = {Journal Of Memory And Language},
year = {2004},
volume = {50},
pages = {82--95},
number = {1},
month = jan,
abstract = {It has been shown that the processing of irregular past-tense forms
is affected by phonological factors that are inherent in the relationship
of the past-tense forms to other words in the lexicon (rhyming families
of irregulars) or to their base forms (vowel dominance effects).
This paper addresses more ephemeral phonological effects. In a sentence-production
task, the vowel of the base form or past-tense form of an irregular
verb (e.g., /i/ of freeze or /oupsilon/ of froze) is primed by an
identical vowel in the subject noun (e.g., base vowel cream, past-tense
vowel chrome, unrelated vowel slot). For verbs with different vowels
in the base form and past-tense form, phonological priming of the
base vowel or of the past-tense vowel increases the rate of overregularization
errors such as *freezed as compared to an unrelated vowel prime.
For verbs with the same vowel in the base and past-tense forms (e.g.,
hit/hit), phonological printing has no effect on the rate of overregularization
errors. It is argued that irregular forms are not produced in a specialized
subnetwork for (irregular) past-tense forms, but are produced in
the general lexical system simultaneous with general phonological
processing. Implications for theories of inflectional morphology
are discussed},
owner = {robfelty},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/Stemberger2004.pdf},
sn = {0749-596X},
timestamp = {2007.02.10},
ut = {ISI:000187570800005}
}
@ARTICLE{Stevens1989,
author = {Kenneth N. Stevens},
title = {On the quantal nature of speech},
journal = {Journal of Phonetics},
year = {1989},
volume = {17},
pages = {3-45},
keywords = {Stevens, quantal }
}
@INCOLLECTION{Stevens1981,
author = {Kenneth N. Stevens and S. E. Blum\-stein},
title = {The search for invariant acoustic correlates of phonetic features},
booktitle = {Perspectives on the Study of Speech},
publisher = {Erlbaum},
year = {1981},
editor = {Elmas Miller},
address = {Hillsdale},
keywords = {Stevens, Blumstein invariant}
}
@ARTICLE{Taft1988,
author = {Taft, Marcus},
title = {A morphological decomposition model of lexical representation},
journal = {Linguistics},
year = {1988 },
volume = {26},
pages = {657-667},
keywords = {Taft, Marcus}
}
@ARTICLE{Taft1979,
author = {Taft, M.},
title = {Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect},
journal = {Memory \& Cognition},
year = {1979},
volume = {7},
pages = {263--272},
owner = {robfelty},
timestamp = {2007.02.09}
}
@ARTICLE{Taft1975,
author = {Taft, Marcus and Kenneth Forster},
title = {Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words},
journal = {Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior},
year = {1975},
volume = {14},
pages = {638-647},
keywords = {Taft, Marcus and Kenneth Forster}
}
@ARTICLE{Vannest2002,
author = {Vannest, Jennifer and Raymond Bertram and Juhani J\"arvikivi and
Jussi Niemi},
title = {Counterintuitive Cross-Linguistic Differences: More Morphological
Computation in {E}nglish than in {F}innish},
journal = {Journal of Psycholinguistic Research},
year = {2002},
volume = {31},
pages = {83-106},
keywords = {Vannest, Jennifer, Raymond Bertram, Juhani Jarvikivi and Jussi Niemi}
}
@MISC{Vannest2006,
author = {Jennifer Vannest and Elissa L. Newport and Daphne Bavelier},
title = {How Frequent is a Word? Reexamining base and surface frequencies},
howpublished = {poster presented at the Fifth International Conference on the Mental
Lexicon},
month = {October},
year = {2006},
booktitle = {poster presented at the Fifth International Conference on the Mental
Lexicon},
owner = {robfelty},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/randomArticles/Vannest_ML_2006.pdf},
timestamp = {2006.11.26}
}
@ARTICLE{Vitevitch2005,
author = {Michael S. Vitevitch and Paul A. Luce},
title = {Increases in phonotactic probability facilitate spoken nonword repetition},
journal = JML,
year = {2005},
volume = {52},
pages = {193-204},
keywords = {vitevitch, luce, phonotactic probability},
owner = {robfelty},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/randomArticles/VitevitchLuceJML2005.pdf},
timestamp = {2006.10.24}
}
@ARTICLE{Vitevitch2004,
author = {Michael S. Vitevitch and Paul A. Luce},
title = {A Web-based interface to calculate phonotactic probability for words
and nonwords in English},
journal = {Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, \& Computers},
year = {2004},
volume = {36},
pages = {481-487},
number = {3},
keywords = {phonotactic probability, positional frequency, vitevitch, luce, lexical
access},
owner = {robfelty},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/VitevitchLuce2004phonoProb.pdf},
timestamp = {2006.09.28}
}
@ARTICLE{Vitevitch1999,
author = {Michael S. Vitevitch and Paul A. Luce},
title = {Probabilistic Phonotactics and Neighborhood Activation in Spoken
Word Recognition},
journal = JML,
year = {1999},
volume = {40},
pages = {374-406},
owner = {robfelty},
pdf = {file://localhost/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/VitevitchAndLuce1999.pdf},
timestamp = {2006.10.24}
}
@ARTICLE{Vitevitch1998,
author = {Michael S. Vitevitch and Paul A. Luce},
title = {WHEN WORDS COMPETE: Levels of Processing in Perception of Spoken
Words},
journal = {Psychological Science},
year = {1998},
volume = {9},
pages = {325-329},
owner = {robfelty},
pdf = {file://localhost/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/VitevitchAndLuce1998.pdf},
timestamp = {2006.10.24}
}
@ARTICLE{Weber2004,
author = {Weber, Andrea and Anne Cutler},
title = {Lexical competition in non- native spoken-word recognition},
journal = {Journal of Memory and Language},
year = {2004},
volume = {50},
pages = {1- 25},
keywords = {Weber, Andrea and Anne Cutler}
}
@ARTICLE{Wickelgren1969,
author = {W. A. Wickelgren},
title = {Context-sensitive coding, associative memory, and serial order in
(speech) behavior},
journal = {Psychological Review},
year = {1969},
volume = {76},
pages = {1-15},
owner = {robfelty},
timestamp = {2007.02.12}
}
@ARTICLE{Wiese1986,
author = {Richard Wiese},
title = {Schwa and the structure of words in German},
journal = {Linguistics},
year = {1986},
volume = {24},
pages = {695-724},
owner = {robfelty},
timestamp = {2007.02.14}
}
@ARTICLE{Wijngaarden2002,
author = {van Wijngaarden, S. J. and Steeneken, H. J. M. and Houtgast, T.},
title = {Quantifying the intelligibility of speech in noise for non-native
listeners},
journal = {Journal Of The Acoustical Society Of America},
year = {2002},
volume = {111},
pages = {1906--1916},
number = {4},
month = apr,
owner = {robfelty},
sn = {0001-4966},
timestamp = {2007.02.03},
ut = {ISI:000175000900039}
}
@INCOLLECTION{Wunderlich1997,
author = {Wunderlich, Dieter},
title = {Der unterspezifizierte {A}rtikel},
booktitle = {Sprache im Fokus},
publisher = {Niemeyer},
year = {1997},
editor = {Christa D\"urscheid and Karl-Heinz Ramers and Monika Schwarz},
pages = {47-55},
address = {T\"ubingen},
keywords = {Wunderlich, underspecification}
}
@ARTICLE{Zhou2000,
author = {Zhou, X. and Marslen-Wilson, W.D.},
title = {Lexical representation of compound words: Cross-linguistic evidence},
journal = {Psychologia},
year = {2000},
volume = {43},
pages = {47--66},
owner = {robfelty},
timestamp = {2007.02.13}
}
@ARTICLE{Zhou1995,
author = {Zhou, X. and Marslen-Wilson, W.D.},
title = {Morphological structure in the Chinese mental lexicon},
journal = {Language and Cognitive Processes},
year = {1995},
volume = {10},
pages = {545--601},
owner = {robfelty},
timestamp = {2007.02.13}
}
@BOOK{Zipf1935,
title = {The psycho-biology of language: An introduction to dynamic philology},
publisher = {Houghton Mifflin},
year = {1935},
author = {Zipf, G.K.},
address = {Cambridge, MA},
owner = {robfelty},
timestamp = {2007.02.09}
}
@ARTICLE{Zwicky1986,
author = {Zwicky, Arnold M.},
title = {The general case: Basic form versus default form},
journal = {Berkeley Linguistics Society},
year = {1986},
volume = {12},
pages = {305-315},
keywords = {Zwicky, basic , default}
}
@ARTICLE{Zwitserlood2000,
author = {Zwitserlood, Pienie and B\"olte, Jens and Dohmes, Petra},
title = {Morphological effects on speech production: Evidence from picture
naming},
journal = {Language and Cognitive Processes},
year = {2000},
volume = {15},
pages = {563--591},
number = {4 - 5},
month = aug,
owner = {robfelty},
pdf = {/Users/robfelty/RobsDocs/prospectus/articles/Zwitserlood2000.pdf},
timestamp = {2006.12.13},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01690960050119706}
}
@PROCEEDINGS{Strange1995,
title = {Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Theoretical and Methodological
Issues},
year = {1995},
editor = {Winifred Strange},
address = {Timonium, MD},
publisher = {York Press},
keywords = {strange cross-linguistics}
}